[Delayed esophagojejunostomy as a damage control principle]. / Otsrochennyi ezofagoeyunoanastomoz kak printsip «Damage Control¼.

The authors describe 2 patients with rare gastric diseases and indications for gastrectomy with delayed esophagojejunostomy for objective causes. In one case, they could not determine extent of resection, and other patient had hemorrhagic shock. Damage control principle was applied in both cases.

Long-term functional and quality of life outcomes in laryngectomized patients after successful voice restoration using tracheoesophageal prostheses.

OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term functional and quality of life (QoL) outcomes and their predictive factors in laryngectomized patients after successful voice restoration using tracheoesophageal prostheses (TEP). METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in alive and disease-free patients at least 1 year after total laryngectomy ± partial pharyngectomy. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core (QLQ-C30) and Head and Neck Cancer (QLQ-H&N35) QoL questionnaires, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-10) questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The level of dysphagia was evaluated using the Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) and the Dysphagia Outcomes and Severity Scale (DOSS). Predictive factors of these clinical outcomes were determined in univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included in this study. Long-term QoL and functioning scales scores were all superior to 70%. Main persistent symptoms were fatigue, dyspnea, senses, speech and coughing problems. A DOSS score ≥6, indicating normal/subnormal swallowing function, and a VHI-10 score ≤20, representing light to medium voice disorders, were found in at least 75% of patients. An anxiodepressive disorder (HADS global score ≥ 15) was reported by 15 (31%) patients and represented the main predictor of QoL and voice outcomes. A strong correlation was found between VHI-10 and global QoL scores. CONCLUSIONS: After successful voice restoration, laryngectomized patients achieved satisfactory QoL and functional outcomes. Psychological distress was the main determinant of long-term QoL and is therefore of critical importance in the multidisciplinary management of laryngectomized patients.

Comparison of surgical outcomes among different methods of esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I proximal gastric cancer: results of a single-arm multicenter phase II clinical trial in Korea, KLASS 03.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer has been widely accepted, but laparoscopic total gastrectomy has still not gained popularity because of technical difficulty and unsolved safety issue. We conducted a single-arm multicenter phase II clinical trial to evaluate the safety and the feasibility of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I proximal gastric cancer in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality in Korea. The secondary endpoint of this trial was comparison of surgical outcomes among the groups that received different methods of esophagojejunostomy (EJ). METHODS: The 160 patients of the full analysis set group were divided into three groups according to the method of EJ, the extracorporeal circular stapling group (EC; n = 45), the intracorporeal circular stapling group (IC; n = 64), and the intracorporeal linear stapling group (IL; n = 51). The clinicopathologic characteristics and the surgical outcomes were compared among these three groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the early complication rates among the three groups (26.7% vs. 18.8% vs. 17.6%, EC vs. IC vs. IL; p = 0.516). The length of mini-laparotomy incision was significantly longer in the EC group than in the IC or IL group. The anastomosis time was significantly shorter in the EC group than in the IL group. The time to first flatus was significantly shorter in the IL group than in the EC group. The long-term complication rate was not significantly different among the three groups (4.4% vs. 12.7% vs. 7.8%; EC vs. IC vs. IL; p = 0.359), however, the long-term incidence of EJ stenosis in IC group (10.9%) was significantly higher than in EC (0%) and IL (2.0%) groups (p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: The extracorporeal circular stapling and the intracorporeal linear stapling were safe and feasible in laparoscopic total gastrectomy, however, intracorporeal circular stapling increased EJ stenosis.

21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: The use of a small circular stapler (CS) has been reported to increase the incidence of benign anastomotic stricture of the intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy, but no study has evaluated the effects of the CS size on cervical esophagogastrostomy. Based on a propensity-matched comparison, the present study was designed to determine whether the perioperative outcomes differ between 21- and 25-mm CSs after minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis. METHODS: From January 2015 to December 2017, 162 patients who received CS cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were identified from our surgical database. A propensity-matched analysis was used to compare the outcomes between the 21- and 25-mm CS groups. Endpoints included anastomotic leak, dysphagia, reflux, stricture, and other major postoperative outcomes within 6 postoperative months. RESULTS: There were 69 and 93 patients in the 21- and 25-mm CS groups, respectively. Propensity matching produced 57 patients in each group. The two groups were not remarkably different in benign anastomotic stricture rate (P = 0.528). All strictures were resolved by balloon dilatation. The 25-mm CS group had a significantly longer operative time in cervical anastomosis than the 21-mm group (P = 0.005). No statistically significant differences in anastomotic leak rates, dysphagia scores, reflux scores, or other postoperative complications were noted between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a 21-mm CS in minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis did not result in greater anastomotic stricture as compared with a 25-mm CS. The 21-mm CS was associated with a significantly shorter operative time.

Esophagostomy tube complications in dogs and cats: Retrospective review of 225 cases.

BACKGROUND: Esophagostomy feeding tubes (E-tubes) are an essential tool for management of hyporexic patients' acute and chronic nutritional requirements. Despite their routine use, limited information is available regarding E-tube complications, especially in the recent veterinary literature. OBJECTIVE: To provide an updated descriptive account of E-tube complications in cats and dogs, and to evaluate potential prognostic factors to determine if certain patients are at increased risk for complications. ANIMALS: One hundred two dogs and 123 cats. METHODS: Retrospective study evaluating patients that had E-tubes placed between March 2014 and March 2017. RESULTS: One hundred patients (44.4%) experienced a complication related to tube placement, with a similar complication rate among dogs (43.1%) and cats (45.5%). Twenty-two cats (17.8%) and 14 dogs (13.7%) developed signs of infection at the E-tube site, with 5 cats (22.7%) and 5 dogs (35.7%) requiring surgical debridement. Regurgitation of food through the E-tube stoma was noted in 7 dogs and 1 cat. Three patients were euthanized as a result of tube-related complications. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: We have provided an updated descriptive review of complications associated with E-tube placement in a large population of dogs and cats at a tertiary referral center. Although E-tubes are essential tools that generally are safe and well tolerated, several complications can occur. We did not identify any specific factors that increase patient risk for these complications, and therefore it is important that all patients are closely monitored and clients are educated to pursue prompt veterinary assessment when such complications arise.

Esophageal feeding tube placement and the associated complications in 248 cats.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal feeding tubes are commonly used to provide enteral nutrition to cats, but their use is associated with adverse effects. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the complications associated with e-tube placement in cats and to identify factors predisposing to these complications. ANIMALS: Cats that had an esophageal feeding tube placed (n = 248). METHODS: This was a retrospective case review in which clinical records were interrogated across 2 referral centers to identify records of cats that had esophageal tubes placed. Clinical data were collected for signalment, clinical indication, method of placement, time of removal, and any complications. Logistic regression was then employed to assess the odds of an increase in complications, including infection and death. RESULTS: For those cats that survived to discharge, tubes were in place for a median of 11 days, ranging from 1 to 93 days. Complications occurred in 35.8% of the cats, with the most common being tube dislodgement (14.5%), followed by stoma site infections (12.1%). Cats receiving glucocorticoids or oncolytic agents (OR = 3.91; 95% CI, 1.14-13.44) and with discharge at the stoma site (OR = 159.8; CI, 18.9-1351) were at an increased odds of developing a stoma site infection, whereas those with a lower weight (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.02-1.75) or (pancreatic [OR = 4.33; 95% CI, 1.02-18.47], neoplastic [OR = 15.44; 95% CI, 3.67-65.07], respiratory [OR = 19.66; 95% CI, 2.81-137.48], urogenital [OR = 5.78; 95% CI, 1.15-28.99], and infectious diseases [OR = 11.57; 95% CI, 2.27-58.94]) had an increased odds of death. The duration of time in place and the cat being discharged with the tube in place were not associated with an increased risk of infection or death. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Owners should be made aware of the potential risks involved and their predisposing factors.

Drainage Tubeless (DRESS) Bypass Surgery as the Best Palliative Care for Unresectable Thoracic Esophageal Cancer with and without Esophago-Respiratory Fistula.

Approximately half of the patients with esophageal cancer are diagnosed at an advanced stage with inoperable disease. The technique of bypass surgery, which is one of the palliative procedures for esophageal cancer, usually requires the insertion of a drainage tube for clearing secretions from the blind remnant esophagus. Since the artificial drainage tube is sometimes problematic for the patient after discharge from the hospital, drainage tubeless (DRESS) surgery might be preferable. The authors demonstrated the utility of DRESS bypass surgery by adding esophagostomy in the right supraclavicular region in three patients with unresectable esophageal cancer with and without esophago-respiratory fistula. All patients had been able to take per-orally and discharged the hospital. Two of three patients are alive with per-oral intake at 1 year later. This DRESS bypass surgery technique, which has not hardly reported in the literature, could release the patients from the tube trouble after the discharge from the hospital and give the patients the better quality of life.

Stenosis after esophagojejunostomy with the hemi-double-stapling technique using the transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™) in Roux-en-Y reconstruction with its efferent loop located on the patient's left side following laparoscopic total gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: The drawback of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with the double-stapling technique (DST) using a transorally inserted anvil (OrVil™, Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) following laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is not only the high incidence of stenosis but also the presence of intractable stenosis that is refractory to endoscopic treatments. METHODS: From November 2013 to December 2016, 24 patients with gastric cancer underwent intracorporeal circular-stapled esophagojejunostomy with the hemi-double-stapling technique (hemi-DST) using the OrVil™ in antecolic Roux-en-Y reconstruction with its efferent loop located on the left side of the patient following LTG to prevent twisting of the esophagojejunostomy and lifted jejunum, which might cause intractable stenosis of the esophagojejunostomy. RESULTS: In this patient series, no twisting of the esophagojejunostomy and lifted jejunum was encountered intraoperatively or postoperatively. Two stenoses of the esophagojejunostomy occurred. Because neither was involved with twisting and both were localized at the anastomotic plane, endoscopic treatments including balloon dilation and electrocautery incisional therapy were successful in both cases. There were no patients with intractable stenosis in this series. CONCLUSIONS: Intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy with the hemi-DST using the OrVil™ in antecolic Roux-en-Y reconstruction with its efferent loop located on the left side of the patient can be one option for a circular stapling technique in LTG due to its prevention of intractable stenosis of the esophagojejunostomy that is refractory to endoscopic treatments.

The crossover technique for intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy following laparoscopic total gastrectomy: a simple and safe technique using a linear stapler and two barbed sutures.

BACKGROUND: Totally laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is preferred over open gastrectomy because it allows safe anastomosis, a small wound, and early bowel recovery. However, esophagojejunostomy (EJS) following laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) remains technically challenging. To popularize LTG, a secure method of reconstruction must be developed. We present a simple and safe technique for intracorporeal EJS following LTG. METHODS: Our modified technique for intracorporeal EJS as a part of Roux-en-Y reconstruction following LTG incorporates an isoperistaltic stapled EJS with closure of the entry hole using two unidirectional barbed sutures. First, a side-to-side isoperistaltic EJS is created between the dorsal and left side of the esophagus and the jejunal arm. Second, the opening for the stapler is closed with a two-layer continuous suture using two 15-cm 3-0 V-Loc suture devices. The full-thickness inner layer closure commences from the sides of the staple lines and progresses toward the center of the enterotomy. During suturing, the remaining thread is utilized to apply tension and lift the enterotomy. Once the full-thickness layer closure is complete at the center of the enterotomy, suturing of the second seromuscular layer is started in the forward direction toward each corner to give a crossover-shaped suturing line. RESULTS: From February 2012 to October 2017, 27 patients with gastric cancer underwent LTG with intracorporeal stapled EJS as a part of Roux-en-Y reconstruction. All procedures were successfully performed without any intra- or postoperative anastomosis-related complications. No conversion to other procedures was required. The mean suturing time was 19.1 ± 9.5 min. The mean postoperative time to tolerating a liquid diet was 3.3 days, and the mean hospital stay was 12.1 days. CONCLUSIONS: We herein report our procedure for intracorporeal EJS using a linear stapler and barbed sutures. This technique is simple and feasible and has acceptable morbidity.

Endoscopic suturing as a less invasive approach for the treatment of anastomotic leakage after esophagogastrostomy - a case report.

Anastomotic leakage is a frequent complication after gastrointestinal (GI) surgery and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Endoluminal therapy offers numerous advantages compared to surgical revision. We present the case of a 74-year-old female patient with anastomotic leakage after esophagogastrostomy. The defect was closed using the OverStitch endoscopic suturing system with immediate technical and clinical success. Hereby, an example of the feasibility of this novel technique in a case of anastomotic leakage is presented and provides an outlook for the rising importance of endoscopic therapy.

Fluoroscopic guidance biopsy for severe anastomotic stricture after esophagogastrostomy of esophageal carcinoma: A STROBE-compliant article.

To determine the safety and effectiveness of fluoroscopic guidance biopsy in the diagnosis of serve anastomotic stricture after esophagogastrostomy for esophageal carcinoma.A total of 55 patients with severe anastomotic stricture were enrolled for forceps biopsy between June 2013 and July 2017. Chest computed tomography (CT) and esophagogram were used to determine the location and extent of stricture. Specimens were collected from the site of stricture by using biopsy forceps under fluoroscopic guidance. Stooler's dysphagia score was compared before and after treatment.The technical success rate of fluoroscopic guidance biopsy was 100%, with no serious complications occurred. A total of 38 patients were diagnosed as benign stricture, of which, 2 patients were further diagnosed as cancer by further biopsy, with a missed diagnosis rate of 5.3%, and 1 patient developed squamous cell carcinoma after 5 months. Thus 20 cases were diagnosed as cancer, 3 cases were adenocarcinoma and 17 cases were squamous cell carcinoma. Balloon dilation was performed for 20 patients (33 times) of benign stricture, and 9 patients (10 times) of malignant stricture. A total of 26 esophageal covered stents were implanted for benign restenosis after repeated balloon dilation. A total of 8 esophageal covered stents were implanted for malignant stricture. After esophagus stenting, dysphagia was immediately alleviated. The dysphagia score decreased from 3.4 ±â€Š0.1 to 0.7 ±â€Š0.1 (P < .001) after treatment.Fluoroscopic guidance biopsy is a safe and effective procedure for directing appropriate treatment of anastomotic stricture after esophagogastrostomy, and it may be an alternative approach for patients who cannot tolerate fibergastroscopy.

Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Metal Stent Placement for Esophagojejunostomy Leakage After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Management of esophagojejunostomy leakage (EJL) has a high mortality rate and increases length of hospital stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of early postoperative gastroduodenoscopy and stent insertion to control EJL after total gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 421 patients, 13 exhibited EJL. Of the 13 patients, 8 were treated with a covered self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) inserted by endoscopy and 5 patients were treated with surgery or conservative treatment. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 0% in the SEMS-treated group. The median duration from primary surgery to discovery of leakage was 3.00 days overall [interquartile range (IQR), 2.00 to 5.50 d]. The time to enteral feeding after operation was 24.00 days (IQR, 18.00 to 31.00 d). Median postoperative hospital days was 35.0 days (IQR, 21.00 to 65.00 d). Median duration from leakage to gastroduodenoscopy was 7.00 days (IQR, 1.25 to 14.50 d). On endoscopic findings, most sizes of leakage site were 25% or smaller (8/9, 88.9%) within whole anastomosis size. Eight patients were treated by SEMS. No endoscopic procedure-related or leakage-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The promising results for endoscopic treatment in this study showed that early endoscopic treatment using a covered SEMS for EJL might be a feasible, safe, and effective method in selected patients.

Comparison of Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Esophagojejunostomy after Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis Based on Short-Term Outcomes.

BACKGROUND:: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is increasingly performed in patients with gastric cancer. However, the usage of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (IEJ) following LTG is limited, as the safety and efficacy remain unclear. The present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of IEJ following LTG. METHODS:: Studies published from January 1994 to January 2017 comparing the outcomes of IEJ and extracorporeal esophagojejunostomy (EEJ) following LTG were reviewed and collected from the PubMed, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, Embase, and China National Knowledge Internet (CNKI). Operative results, postoperative recovery, and postoperative complications were compared and analyzed. The weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS:: Seven nonrandomized studies with 785 patients were included. Compared with EEJ, IEJ has less blood loss (WMD: -13.52 ml; 95% CI: -24.82--2.22; P = 0.02), earlier time to first oral intake (WMD: -0.49 day; 95% CI: -0.83--0.14; P < 0.01), and shorter length of hospitalization (WMD: -0.62 day; 95% CI: -1.08--0.16; P < 0.01). There was no significant difference between IEJ and EEJ regarding the operation time, anastomotic time, number of retrieved lymph nodes, time to first flatus, anastomosis leakage rate, anastomosis stenosis rate, and proximal resections (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with EEJ, IEJ has better cosmesis, milder surgical trauma, and a faster postoperative recovery. IEJ can be performed as safely as EEJ. IEJ should be encouraged to surgeons with sufficient expertise.

The Impact of the Location of Esophagogastrostomy on Acid and Duodenogastroesophageal Reflux After Transthoracic Esophagectomy with Gastric Tube Reconstruction and Intrathoracic Esophagogastrostomy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the location of esophagogastrostomy on acid and duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) in patients undergoing gastric tube reconstruction and intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy. METHODS: Thirty patients receiving transthoracic esophagectomy without cervical lymph node dissection and gastric tube reconstruction by intrathoracic anastomosis were enrolled. All patients underwent 24-h pH and bilirubin monitoring and gastrointestinal endoscopy one year after surgery. Patients were divided into three groups according to esophagogastrostomy location: group A (n = 9), above the top of the aortic arch; group B (n = 15), between the top and bottom of the aortic arch; and group C (n = 6), below the bottom of the aortic arch. The relations among the esophagogastrostomy location, 24-h pH and bilirubin monitoring results, endoscopic findings, and reflux symptoms were investigated. RESULTS: No acid reflux into the remnant esophagus was observed in group A, whereas it was observed in three of 15 patients (20%) in group B and in two of six patients (33%) in group C (P = 0.139). No DGER was found in group A, whereas DGER was observed in eight (53%) patients in group B and all patients in group C (P < 0.001). Reflux esophagitis was observed in one patient (11%) in group A, five patients (33%) in group B, and all patients in group C (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: In gastric tube reconstruction via intrathoracic anastomosis, esophagogastrostomy should be performed above the top of the aortic arch to prevent postoperative DGER and reduce the incidence of reflux esophagitis.

Utilization of Gastric Conduit in the Management of Combined Corrosive Esophageal and Stomach Stricture.

BACKGROUND: Corrosive stricture of esophagus may be associated with variable involvement of stomach. We analyzed the outcome of gastric conduit used in the management of corrosive esophageal stricture with concomitant antro-pyloric stricture. STUDY DESIGN: Among 101 esophageal replacements performed, 53 patients had combined esophagus and stomach strictures. Colon was used as a conduit in 43 patients, while stomach was used in ten patients. Indications, perioperative complications and early/late outcomes of patients with gastric pull-up were reviewed and compared with those undergone colon pull-up. RESULTS: The indications of using gastric conduit were impromptu in four patients [colonic conduit ischemia (n = 2) and an oversight of antro-pyloric stricture after forming the gastric conduit (n = 2)]. Six patients had preconceived gastric conduit (distal antro-pyloric stricture with distended stomach). The median age was 29 years (range 16-50), and median BMI was 15.4 kg/m2 (range 14.5-20.1). The stomach was drained using loop gastrojejunostomy (n = 7) or Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy (n = 3). One patient died due to sepsis secondary to anastomotic leak. Median hospital stay was 9 days (range 7-22). At median follow-up of 25 months (range 14-80), the remaining nine patients are able to have solid diet and have gained weight. The level of esophageal stricture was low (p = 0.01), and duration of surgery (p = 0.02) and median hospital stay (p = 0.04) were significantly less in patients with gastric conduit plus drainage as compared to patients undergone colonic pull-up. CONCLUSION: Gastric conduit in a subject with distal antro-pyloric stricture can be used safely along with gastrojejunostomy in selected patients of corrosive esophageal stricture.

Early Postoperative Endoscopy for Evaluation of the Anastomosis after Esophageal Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leaks significantly affect hospital stay after esophageal surgery. Here, we investigated the efficacy of early endoscopy for predicting anastomotic healing and leaks after esophageal reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 65 consecutive esophageal cancer patients treated by cervical esophagogastrostomy underwent routine endoscopy between postoperative days 5 and 7. The anastomosis was scored for the degree of ischemia, stenosis, and torsion of the anastomotic axis. Independent associations between ischemia, stenosis, and torsion of the proximal esophagus and the risk of the anastomotic leak were examined using Spearman's rank correlation method. RESULTS: Assessment of the degree of mucosal ischemia in 65 patients shows well healing in 35, patch ischemia in 20, diffuse ischemia in 10, no necrosis in any patient. Stenosis was classified as 0 to 10% in 40 patients, 11 to 20% in 12, 21 to 80% in 11, and 81 to 100% in 2. The degree of torsion of the anastomotic axis was classified as 0 to 10 degrees in 52 patients, 11 to 90 degrees in 8, and 91 to 180 degrees in 5. With rising endoscopy scores, there was an increase in risk for leaks (score > 4.5, sensitivity 100%, and specificity 83.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Early postoperative endoscopy facilitates the management of esophagogastrostomy anastomosis to predict leaks.

Spontaneous intra-abdominal haemorrhage due to segmental arterial mediolysis following oesophagocolojejunostomy.

Segmental arterial mediolysis is a rare vascular disease that leads to spontaneous intra-abdominal haemorrhage, which causes shock and bowel ischaemia, and is associated with a high mortality rate. Here, we present a case of spontaneous intra-abdominal haemorrhage due to segmental arterial mediolysis in a patient who underwent oesophagocolojejunostomy for synchronous triple primary cancer, which was treated successfully by coil embolization. We conclude that a preoperative angiogram is necessary to detect vascular abnormalities, and in cases with severe haemorrhage, an urgent endovascular procedure is the treatment of choice.

Long-term outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagostomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Compared with open approach.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and long-term efficacy of combined thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagostomy(MI-ILE) in the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent Ivor Lewis esophagostomy of esophageal cancer from October 2011 to June 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Of which 90 patients received MI-ILE, 95 patients underwent open Ivor Lewis esophagostomy (O-ILE). The clinicopathological features, intraoperative records and incidences of postoperative complications of the two groups were compared with t-test and χ2 test. The primary end point of the study was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) was a secondary end point. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, preoperative comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists score and position of the tumor between the two groups. There was also no significant difference in clinicopathological characteristics, operation time, length of tumor resection margin and number of resected lymph nodes between the two groups (P > 0.05). In MI-ILE group, the blood loss was lower than in the O-ILE group [(159.1 + 97.4) ml vs. (191.7 + 141.9) ml, t = 1.811, P = 1.811]and the postoperative hospital stay was shorter [(11.5 + 4.5) d vs. (13.9 + 6.2) d, t = 2.944, P = 0.004]. There was no significant difference in the incidences of perioperative mortality and major morbidities (P > 0.05). Minor complications including incision infection rate (1.1% vs 8.4%, χ2 = 3.873, P = 0.049) and pulmonary infection incidence (3.3% vs 11.57%, χ2 = 4.492, P = 0.034) is lower in MIILE group. There was no significant difference in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 3-year overall survival (OS) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: MI-ILE is a technically safe and feasible approach for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treatment. The oncologic outcomes of MI-ILE are comparable to that of O-ILE 3 years after resection.